The differences between the history and memory of the World War II
Your goal here with this paper is to critically analyze Mark A. Stoler’s “The Second World War in U. S. History and Memory,” (link enclosed) address the issue of historical fact as interpreted by historians versus how we remember the past. Remember to cite in text. (I don’t want a paper full of quotes- no more then 3) I would love to see an incorporation of pop culture as a contrast to Stoler.
After reading Mark A. Stoler’s “The Second World War in U. S. History and Memory,” write a three-page paper (excluding title and reference pages) addressing the differences between the history and memory of the war
The title of the paper: The differences between the history and memory of the World War II
This is the link to where you can view his article:
http://vi.uh.edu/pages/buzzmat/DH%20articles/WW%20II/stoler.pdf
Engage Stoler’s analysis, especially his theory regarding the way succeeding generations viewed the war, and explain why you agree or disagree with it. Your paper must have a thesis statement that serves as the main idea of your paper. You may find it useful to contrast the view of the war presented by Stoler (and by the text) with the way the war is treated in movies and on television.
This paper must also have a conclusion
Comments
Post a Comment